It’s safe to say that the U.S. stock market in 2025 has been something of a paradox, with record-breaking performance and simmering economic anxiety. While the S&P 500 has notched a terrific year by all accounts, with gains of roughly 16%, the underlying foundation of this really is being tested by a series of significant policy shifts. Investors have largely prioritized the promises of artificial intelligence and an easing rate environment, but the arrival of universal tariffs has introduced a layer of uncertainty that even the most optimistic models are struggling to reconcile.
The S&P 500 trades at a P/E of 22.4x, one of its most expensive valuations in 40 years.
Federal Reserve research confirms tariffs will increase unemployment and slow GDP growth.
Consumer sentiment hit its second-lowest level in history in November.
If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, there are three quick questions causing many Americans to realize they can retire earlier than expected. take 5 minutes to learn more here
As we enter the final two weeks of 2025, what was once a theoretical debate about trade policy has become a confirmed economic headwind. New research from the Federal Reserve confirms that concerns regarding slowing growth are not just market noise anymore, but are backed by 150 years of solid data. With valuations now sitting at historical extremes and consumer sentiment at multi-decade lows, the dual combination of these factors signals that the market’s high-flying run is about to enter a concerning phase that both retail and experienced investors should take note of.
The headline success of the S&P 500 in 2025 has helped mask what is likely to become a sobering reality, in that the market is currently trading at one of its most expensive valuations in the past 40 years. As of December, the index is carrying a price-to-earnings (P/E) of 22.4x, which is significantly higher than its 5-year average of 20x and a 10-year average of 18.7x. Historically, when the S&P 500 has exceeded this 22x threshold, something it has only done twice, during the dot-com bubble and 2020 pandemic, both of which were followed by sharp market corrections.
The contradiction between price and valuation is particularly striking given the current economic environment. While earnings have remained strong, the premium that investors are willing to pay for each dollar of profit has reached levels that don’t leave any room for financial error. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks are also responsible for a disproportionate share of any gains, creating a top-heavy market structure that is increasingly vulnerable to any disruptions in global trade or corporate margins.
For the everyday investor, this 4o-year extreme means that the “margin of safety” has pretty much evaporated. When stock prices run this far ahead of historical averages, forward-looking returns are typically muted or negative as the market eventually reverts to its mean. This setup places a lot of pressure on the 2026 earnings cycle to deliver even stronger results.
What was once a concern over rich valuations has been validated by a new study from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Researchers examined over a century of data from the U.S. and international markets and reached a definitive conclusion that the implementation of aggressive tariffs will increase unemployment and slow, perhaps significantly, GDP growth. This finding directly challenges any narrative that trade barriers will automatically revitalize domestic manufacturing without causing broader economic harm.
The mechanics of this slowdown are fairly straightforward but devastating for corporate profitability. Tariffs act as a hidden tax on domestic firms and consumers, with research from Goldman Sachs indicating that US companies are now collectively paying 82% of these duties. As input costs rise for everything from aluminum to electronics, companies have to decide whether to absorb these costs or pass them on to consumers.
This research suggests that any exceptionalism seen in U.S. economic performance over the past three years may be nearing its end. The Budget Lab at Yale estimated that tariffs could reduce GDP growth by a full half percentage point across both 2025 and 2026, meaning the engine of the American economy could be throttled. For an already expensive stock market, a slowdown in the primary driver of earnings indicates a serious fundamental risk is on the horizon.
The confluence of 40-year valuation extremes and slowing economic growth creates a uniquely dangerous environment for the “buy and hold” crowd. When the S&P 500 is priced for perfection, but the underlying economy is facing headwinds, the risk of a “deleveraging” event increases exponentially. Historically, we have seen that high P/E ratios are manageable when growth is accelerating. However, they can also become a recipe for disappointment when growth targets are being revised downward.
Adding to this concern is the collapse of consumer sentiment, which is now at its second-lowest level in history as of this past November. It should go without saying that consumers are signaling some deep-seated fears about jobs and rising prices, which historically serve as a leading indicator of a pull-back in spending that drives approximately 70% of the US economy.
For a market trading at 22.4x forward earnings, this disconnect between record-high asset prices and record-low consumer confidence is a flashing red signal that the current rally we’re all enjoying now might lack a sustainable base. By recognizing that the Fed’s research has confirmed a period of slower growth ahead, you can take the necessary steps right now to protect your wealth from the potential valuation reset that history may very well be predicting is coming soon.
For investors, this warning isn’t about predicting a crash or a call to get ready to panic sell. It’s about recognizing that the risk has meaningfully increased and adjusting portfolios accordingly. This is especially true if you are holding in companies that have led the market higher over the past three years, as they may be the most vulnerable to compression when economic data disappoints.
Ultimately, in this environment, the smartest move for investors may be to shift away from chasing market noise and toward building portfolio durability. Priority should be given to income-generating assets and high-quality dividend growers that provide a cash-flow cushion, regardless of price volatility.
Dividend stocks and ETFs can help provide a cushion through cash distributions while still participating in market gains. Retirees should approach the market with greater caution than younger investors, who have longer time horizons and greater flexibility.
You may think retirement is about picking the best stocks or ETFs, but you’d be wrong. Even great investments can be a liability in retirement. It’s a simple difference between accumulating vs distributing, and it makes all the difference.
The good news? After answering three quick questions many Americans are reworking their portfolios and finding they can retire earlier than expected. If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, take 5 minutes to learn more here.
